Comments on: Exclusive: Is Misty Croslin Telling Tales?

By: cayla

cayla — Sun, 30 May 2010 04:18:41 +0000

Art!… just through months of fallowing the information and docs. on haleigh. I came across a picture of Brandon Overstreet and Misty, upon looking him up on the internet…i found some myspace pages and more information on him that seems kinda shadey. He is related to Joe Overstreet,now lives in Florida,and after all the publicity with Misty still has her picture on his personal pages. I guess ,or more if it were me i would not put that information out there for everyone to see.Is there something more to this? or has it been already cleared and he just thinks it cool? Look him up on his myspace…some interesting stuff there.

By: marlo-FL

marlo-FL — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:30:19 +0000

I think Ronald Cummings knows more than letting on. I think the cops think that if they keep Ronald and Misty in jail they will talk or “Break” but I think Misty will say anything to get out of jail. I think her whole entire family- parents included KNOW THE REAL TRUTH!!!!!! I also want to know how Misty can flunk all of these polygraph tests and then show her face on tv to say she doesnt know anything about what happened to the girl. THAT IS JUST VERY UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!! Thanks Art for all you do for the poor victims!!!!!

By: Art Harris

Art Harris — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:50:35 +0000

S– NO gag orders in the case, so the lawyers and others can speak freely to those they trust in the media. Art

By: S. Moffatt

S. Moffatt — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:19:03 +0000

Art, my comments just sit waiting for moderation, so I will try once again. I hold a JD (Retired)as well as loud mouth NG, however, I do not understand how these cheap shows (what ever they billed them as) get access to some of the things they scream “Breaking News” “Bombshell”, in my active years if we ever tried some of these tricks, the judge would have ordered a gag order and someone would have to answer for the illegal exposure of things prior to a fair hearing in a Court of Law, not on the cable or Internet. WHY do you have to wait to break your story on NG’s show (I understand the media exposure) but surely it is important for the public to know, or is NG sandbagging you since she didn’t get the information first?

One last time, NG is a sorry excuse for a so called fighter for missing and abused children. There are so many things she could do to help, other than running weeks about grown people committing adultery (which is not a crime, only God’s law) and remember she blast one guess for mentioning God and/or religion on her show. Anyone who thinks she is concerned or cares about the missing and/or abused needs their head examined.

Thanks and I do appreciate you at least investigating your information prior to releasing same.

By: Miranda Ray

Miranda Ray — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:26:41 +0000

I’d like to point out two things from NG’s report tonight. She said this is the first time Misty brought up Joe but I remember Misty talking about cousin Joe way back not too long after Haleigh disappeared – she even mentioned he had messed with her when she was younger. I also don’t think it’s fair in her recaps of the case to only show partial clips like she cuts off the door pictures when the inside door closes by itself and then doesn’t show the door held open by a pile of clothes. Also in a report not long ago Misty said she saw Joe holding Haleigh – this was reported as when she was under hynosis the first time whenever it was. I admire Nancy for helping to find missing children but when she thinks someone is guilty it seems like she’s going out for vengeance instead of justice. Be back to make some points on Anthony case soon. If Misty goes to jail and Casey gets off it doeesn’t make any sense to me.

By: Art Harris

Art Harris — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:30:56 +0000

Jennifer–thanks for your support and kinds words!! art

By: Art Harris

Art Harris — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:29:49 +0000

Mary=We taped Friday night show Thurs, as well as one for Monday…Two Haleigh shows in a row, focusing on our scoop — MISTY FLUNKS SECRET POLICE LDT….art

By: robbie*

robbie* — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:08:09 +0000

Art, you keep many of my letters in moderation as well. I do not make false accusations at any time and much of my information comes from you, yet you continually let my fact filled missives languish. (I took Criminal Law in school) I am surprised because looong, free streaming articles to you about things having nothing at all to do with this case are posted all the time, sometimes several from the same person, in a row!

If someone accuses me of not knowing my facts, I would like very much for them to see my resources and to know that everything I have said is true and substantiated, AND most likely from your very own site.

I think Nancy Grace may be punishing you Art, for having so many fans who stick up for you and call her on her alley cat, feral ways. Please offer your latest insights on Jane Velez Mitchell’s show instead~ You know you’ll get five minutes of airtime AND she’ll let you answer questions.

Inquiring Minds Want to KNOW! What was in Misty’s letters?!

By: Diane

Diane — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 04:32:50 +0000

Art!

I have wondered the same thing about several of my posts: I have good points, correct grammar, respect for you — and yet most of my posts never make it past moderation. Why is this? I have been watching this case unfold from the beginning, and my point about the made-up beds is important because that small detail makes any speculation that Misty and the kids were in their trailer illogical at best. Please advise how I can successfully get my opinions posted in the future — especially since you seem to post so much material from ‘Freida’, who has such random and prolific things to say!
Thanks,

Diane(AKA Feeling Frustrated)

By: freida

freida — Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:28:07 +0000

You look tired…but Nancy’s the one with her eyes closed before you ‘click the arrow.’