Comments on: Exclusive: Misty Cummings Voice Stress Report!

By: freida

freida — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:34:18 +0000

Poorly written, at best…

Funny thing is how ironic this all is considering I came here in the first place looking to defend someone I saw being nailed to ‘The Cross’ on television, no less.

Or maybe I didn’t, really exactly.

By: freida

freida — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:23:31 +0000

I’m gonna ‘play’ with words…

“Children are a gift…sex, drugs, party binges, etc…are exactly what misguided children do…they needed ‘to be’ or ‘to learn’ another ‘reason’ or ‘self esteem’…or perhaps more simply ‘are just’ in searching for love…

They are not evil, but what ‘they’ can do surely ‘can be.’

By: carolyn

carolyn — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:31:34 +0000

Please see my other comment when it is approved.
I agree with No. 21, CB; I agree with Post No. 12; I agree with almost every Post that says Misty and/or Ronald know what is going on.
I sincerely hope and pray that this little girl is unharmed and alive — AND when she is finally found alive (if so) that she is returned to some good family that wants her.
I hope that Misty and Ronald are punished for their behavior.
Sex, drugs, party binges do not belong with small children. They need to be loved.
Children are a gift. These people do not deserve to have these precious gifts.
Get Misty and Ronald in custody. They are evil people.

By: sloan smith

sloan smith — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:19:36 +0000

I dont believe Misty hurt that child, but I do believe she might have been doing drugs with her brother, who was visiting and believes he did something while she was stoned on what ever

By: philly

philly — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:36:29 +0000

I have always thought the interview that Misty and Ronald did on the Today Show was completely strange. When Misty was asked why she had told different stories about where the kids were sleeping, she looked right at Ronald, (seemingly for his help) he never looked at her, in fact, he was looking down and refused to look at her. Then she answered “I don’t know.” That just tells me Ronald knows something that he is not admitting to.

By: CB

CB — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:03:44 +0000

Haleigh was put in danger living in that home. Drugs, guns, fights, to top it off there were sex offenders visiting there…and Misty’s…alleged weekend sex,drug party binge……Yet..(Ronald) let her be in charge of his children. He should be (charged) with child endangerment.

By: Curious

Curious — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:16:02 +0000

Wow, the Rats are scampering, you were and are right.

By: GINNY

GINNY — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:21:38 +0000

LIE DETECTORS FOR THE MOST PART WORK.I HAVE 2 PERSONAL EXPERENCES WITH THEM AND THEY DO WORK.TED BUNDY MAY NOT HAVE PASSED ONE BUT I BET IF ALL THE ANTHONYS AND CASEY WOULD TAKE ONE THEY WOULD FLUNK WITH FLYING COLARS.

By: They call me J

They call me J — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:11:40 +0000

I did not watch this video nor am I ever going to. There is more than one involved in this crime, someone is not coming forward. If Haleigh had been killed in that home Police would have found evidence of that. It does not make sense for Misty not to come forward if she had left. In fact it would be easier going that route. If she left and someone came in and took the child that would not make her responsible for kidnapping or murder, a charge of child neglect as a 17year old sitter yes, which maybe would yield some probation. If she had passed out and woke up earlier to find her gone why not call the cops then or admit to that? She is still innocent of doing wrong in terms of kidnapping and or murder. Define passed out; let’s assume she passed out at 10ish instead of falling asleep as widely speculated. What does the really mean? Either or way she is not responsible for kidnapping or murder so why hold back? How does one gauge falling asleep apposed to passing out or is this lean towards blacking out? Still with that she would not be responsible for kidnapping or murder hopefully not the latter. The last person there was around 8ish, so the only other probability is that Misty took Haleigh far enough away on foot killed her buried her well enough to not be found made it back on foot cleaned her self and got rid of all evidence that lead to the crime all the while Jr was left alone sleeping and Police can’t find a single shred of evidence to support this. Then there is the theory she sold the child or traded the child for drugs, it is said she prefers Pot. She is going to trade or sell the flat screen and or the Play station, or movies and other articles for Pot, not a child. There are only two logical possibilities, she knows who took the child and is with holding that information, then why? If she was going to involve herself in a crime like that it is going to be with someone she is bonded with, a stranger would tell to quick. The last possibility is that she is telling the truth.
God Bless Haleigh and all her families

By: Debbie K.

Debbie K. — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:07:53 +0000

As I watch these family members with their in-fighting between exes, grandmas …etc. I couldn’t help but notice right from the beginning that Misty Croslin was reminding me of Susan Smith! She would talk on camara to beg for Haleigh’s return, but never made eye contact! Then, on to the bio-mom…who was on TV once that I know of begging for her daughters return, wiping her eyes incessently with a kleenex, but low & behold, no tears whatsoever!! Ronald, who likes to bed young girls, does at least show emotions. And appears to truly miss his daughter…although, seems as though he doesn’t treat his “women” with much respect! So, I just really don’t know about this family! Maybe the little boy that’s still there needs some help, could he be in some kind of danger, also?
Debbie K.